Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Holmes v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01803
Plaintiff:
Paul Holmes
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation , City of New London, Timothy Hanser and others
Cross_claimant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross_defendant:
David Denoia, Timothy Hanser, Richard Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BENTON et al v. OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
as 1:2011cv00840
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTON , SUZANNE BENTON , WALLACE BARBOUR and others
Receiver:
JON A NANCE
Defendant:
OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ajay Gaalla, et al v. Citizens Medical Center, et al
as 10-40246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AJAY GAALLA, Medical Doctor, HARISH CHANDNA, Medical Doctor and DAKSHESH KUMAR PARIKH, Medical Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
CITIZENS MEDICAL CENTER, DAVID P. BROWN, DONALD DAY and others
Gaalla et al v. Citizens Medical Center et al
as 6:2010cv00014
Defendant:
Citizens Medical Center , David P. Brown , Donald Day and others
Plaintiff:
Ajay Gaalla , Harish Chandna and Dakshesh "Kumar&quo Parikh
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Holmes v. Eternal Hills Funeral Home et al
as 1:2009cv00781
Plaintiff:
Paul Holmes
Defendant:
Eternal Hills Funeral Home, Eunice M. Bolling, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Holmes v. Eternal Hills Funeral Home et al
as 1:2009mi00058
Plaintiff:
Paul Holmes
Defendant:
Eternal Hills Funeral Home, Eunice M. Bolling, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Swank v. Terrell et al
as 2:2007cv00238
Plaintiff:
Johnny Swank
Defendant:
Terry Terrell, Cooley and Paul Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
