Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
United States of America v. Adams
as 6:2014cv03540
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Phillip Adams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff: Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant: City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finney et al. v. General Motors LLC et al.
as 1:2011cv00319
Defendant: General Motors LLC , General Motors Corporation and Motors Liquidation Company
Plaintiff: Hannah Finney and Phillip Adam Finney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01820
Petitioner: Phillip Adams
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02535
Petitioner: Phillip Adams
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01325
Petitioner: Phillip Adams
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. USA
as 5:2010cv00256
Plaintiff: Paul Phillip Adams, Jr
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Empi, Inc. v. Finney et al
as 1:2009cv00327
Plaintiff: Empi, Inc. and Empi, Inc.
Defendant: Phillip Adam Finney, ProMed Equipment Partners I, LLC and ProMed Equipment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillip Adams v. Ken Clark
as 09-16324
Petitioner - Appellant: PHILLIP ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee: KEN CLARK
James Strong v. Tyrone Murray We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-8017
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES STRONG
Defendant - Appellee: TYRONE MURRAY, South Carolina Department of Corrections employee, SAM DUCKETT, South Carolina Department of Corrections employee and PHILLIP ADAMS, South Carolina Department of Corrections employee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?