Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Bad Boy Europe LTD. et al
as 3:2016cv02751
Plaintiff:
Platypus Wear, Inc.
Defendant:
Bad Boy Europe LTD., Deep Blue Sports LTD., John Paul Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Johnny Wayne Langston v. Birt K. Adam
as 16-1449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHNNY WAYNE LANGSTON
Defendant - Appellant:
BIRT K. ADAMS, a/k/a Ofc Bert Adams
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHIEF PAUL GARDNER
Nigel Gardner v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41443
Petitioner - Appellant:
NIGEL PAUL GARDNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gardner v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
Nigel Paul Gardner
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Langston v. Georgetown City Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv04536
Plaintiff:
Johnny Wayne Langston
Defendant:
Georgetown City Police Department, Paul Gardner and Bert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Losee v. Gallegos, et al
as 14-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL GRANT LOSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MORRELL, PAUL GARDNER, LARRY BUSSIO and others
James Tennant v. Georgetown, City of
as 14-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. TENNANT
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF, a Municipal Corporation, PAUL GARDNER, ANNE MERCER and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS CHARLES BAXTER, in his individual capacity
Gardner v. Shreveport et al
as 1:2014cv00708
Plaintiff:
Huey Paul Gardner
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, T Washington and Terrell Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Caddo Parish
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
Huey Paul Gardner
Defendant:
Sheriff of Caddo Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Shreve Memorial Library
as 1:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
Huey Paul Gardner
Defendant:
Shreve Memorial Library
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
