Cases 11 - 20 of 34,582
PORTER v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06153
Plaintiff:
HEATHER PORTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Porter v. Big Sandy Furniture, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Marissa Porter
Defendant:
Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. doing business as Big Sandy Superstore
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail and Quality Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Jr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Bobby Walton Jr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byers v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jodie Louis Byers
Defendant:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Phil Sorrels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter Jr. v. St. Onge et al
as 4:2024cv40073
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter Jr.
Defendant:
David St. Onge and Carole St. Onge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Porter v. USA
as 2:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Tyson R Porter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grunewald v. Raimondi et al
as 2:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
Albert Grunewald
Defendant:
John E Raimondi, Mary E Porter and Jennifer A Mendelsohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
