Cases 11 - 20 of 4,513
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joyce Ann Sessom v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv03434
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ann Sessom
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Norm Reeves Ford Superstore and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reeves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tanya Marie Reeves
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marek et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Matt Marek, Debbie Hale, Stephen Reeves and others
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Starnes v. Caroll et al
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mylik Jaquan Starnes
Defendant:
Unknown Caroll, Unknown Russler, Unknown Lattner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breneiser et al v. Mesa, City of
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Christopher Breneiser and Todd Reeves
Defendant:
Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
