Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Longshore v. Mason County et al
as 3:2018cv05069
Plaintiff:
Charles S Longshore
Defendant:
Mason County, Kevin Hanson, Joseph Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DECKER v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00022
Petitioner:
ROBERT DECKER
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Decker v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03481
Plaintiff:
Robert Decker
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Walsh v. International Brotherhood of E
as 17-712
Plaintiff:
James Worden
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Walsh
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (I.B.E.W.) Local 503, Brian Scott, Scott Jensen and others
Defendant:
GenOn Energy Services, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. v. Decker et al
as 3:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Decker , Diane Everett-Kenosky , Mark Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DECKER v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DECKER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walsh et al v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (I.B.E.W.) Local 503 et al
as 7:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
Timothy Walsh and James Worden
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (I.B.E.W.) Local 503 , Brian Scott , Scott Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
24 Hour Fitness USA Incorporated v. Decker
as 2:2011cv02417
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA Incorporated
Defendant:
Robert Decker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
