Cases 11 - 20 of 88
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18166
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. DIRECT SCREENING
as 2:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAVIS
Defendant:
DIRECT SCREENING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ryan Davis, et al v. Simon Contractors, Inc.
as 22-2028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan Davis and Anthony Crane
Defendant / Appellee:
Simon Contractors, Inc., doing business as Ogallala Ready Mix & Block Company
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 2:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Ryan Davis #22692-040
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. TRATE
as 1:2022cv00156
Petitioner:
RYAN DAVIS
Respondent:
BRAD TRATE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis #22692-040 v. Trate
as 1:2022cv00416
Petitioner:
Ryan Davis #22692-040
Respondent:
Brad Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Olsen v. Dubois
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Ryan Davis Olsen
Defendant:
E Dubois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rock Hemp Corp. v. Adam Dunn, et al
as 22-1171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCK HEMP CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM DUNN, RYAN DAVIES and SHAWN KOLODNY
Progressive Garden State Insurance Company v. Ryan-Davis et al
as 1:2021cv01200
Counter Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ANDREA RYAN-DAVIS, BROOKLYN DAVIS and HAYLEY DAVIS
Not Classified By Court:
Feliz Rael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Yang et al v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02658
Plaintiff:
Mai Yang Yang, Hailee Vue, Nou Vue and others
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, John Delmonico, Richard Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
