Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PERRY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04416
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MERVILLE RAY PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Perry, et al v. Hooker Creek Asphalt and Pavin, et al
as 17-35524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY PERRY, United States of America ex rel.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKER CREEK ASPHALT AND PAVING, LLC, OREGON MAINLINE PAVING, LLC, J.C. COMPTON CONTRACTOR, INC. and others
Ricky Ray Perry v. Raymono Maddew
as 5:2015cv02003
Respondent:
Raymono Maddew
Petitioner:
Ricky Ray Perry
Perry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00494
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Perry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2015cv00045
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY RAY PERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00556
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Perry, Sr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Ray Perry v. Don Ross et al
as 5:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ray Perry
Defendant:
Don Ross and Stephen Saleson
Michael Perry v. Hooker Creek Asphalt and Pavin, et al
as 12-35278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY PERRY, United States of America ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKER CREEK ASPHALT AND PAVING, LLC, OREGON MAINLINE PAVING, LLC, J.C. COMPTON CONTRACTOR, INC. and others
Perry v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00026
Petitioner:
Eddie Ray Perry
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Miller et al
as 5:2009cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Perry
Defendant:
V Miller and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
