Cases 11 - 20 of 25,603
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
First National Bank & Trust Company of Ardmore, Ok v. Visual Candy Resources, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00163
Defendant:
CSC, Visual Candy Resources, Inc., Jeffrey Craig Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
First National Bank & Trust Company of Ardmore, Ok
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Debmar-Mercury LLC.
as 24-1229
Plaintiff:
KELVIN HUNTER
Defendant:
DEBMAR-MERCURY LLC., IRA BERNSTEIN, MORT MARCUS and others
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
