Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ramirez et al v. Cajun Pressure Control, LLC
as 2:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Cruz Ramirez , Ricardo Pena , Pedro Moreno and others
Defendant:
Cajun Pressure Control, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Trevino et al v. CSOS, LLC f/k/a Cornell Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Trevino , Joe Prado , Eduardo Trevino and others
Defendant:
CSOS, LLC, KLX Energy Services, LLC , Carlos I. Garza, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pena et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20729
Plaintiff:
Susana Pena and Ricardo Pena
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Portillo v. 552 Seneca Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02328
Defendant:
552 Seneca Enterprises, Inc., Ricardo Pena and Dulce Suriel
Plaintiff:
Edwin Portillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Osorno et al v. 552 Seneca Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03899
Defendant:
552 Seneca Enterprises, Inc., Ricardo Pena and Dulce Suriel
Plaintiff:
Fortunato Hernandez, Dayna Osorno and Artemio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gallegos v. USA
as 4:2009cv00320
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Ricardo Pena Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pena-Bustos v. USA
as 2:2009cv00064
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo Pena-Bustos
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brown v. CDCR et al
as 2:2008cv01880
Plaintiff:
Ronnie O'Niel Brown
Defendant:
CDCR, Karim E. Noujim, K. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.02 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.02 Acres of Land, More or Less, ricardo pena, carmen v pena and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
