Cases 11 - 20 of 2,297
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE C. SAMPSON, SR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, TAMARA RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Jennings Walker v. Loy et al
as 6:2024cv06030
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Jennings Walker
Defendant:
Detective Rick Loy, Correctional Officer Donald Sampson-Hunter, Correctional Officer Tyler McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Smallwood v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03064
Plaintiff:
Lamarquis Smallwood
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Ms. Sampson, Tamara Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
