Cases 11 - 20 of 1,866
Emery v. Holt et al
as 1:2024cv03486
Defendant:
Gregory House, Preston Crowder, Ahmed Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Kristie Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aigbohan
as 4:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shamika Morgan, Revell Edward Hicks, Jr., Quinishia McDowell and others
Defendant:
Lifecare 2.1, LLC, Lifecare 2.0, LLC, Lifecare 2.0 Management Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Valsaint v. City of Miami Beach, Florida et al
as 1:2024cv22886
Defendant:
Gustavo Blacio, David Cajuso, Orlando Sosa, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Alberonick Valsaint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Konstantinoff v. NYPD et al
as 1:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Valerio Konstantinoff
Defendant:
NYPD, NYPD Detective Sammy Sosa and City of NY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mejia-Sosa v. Garland
as 24-1901
Petitioner:
DYLAN JOSELUIS VILLEDA-MEJIA and KATHERINE VANESSA MEJIA-SOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Chatman v. Duran et al
as 2:2024cv01929
Defendant:
H. Ortiz Zamora, J. Davis, B. Patillo and others
Plaintiff:
Audree Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
