Cases 11 - 20 of 728
SEARCY v. CLAY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
GARY SEARCY
Defendant:
INDIANA * CLAY COUNTY, CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Searcy v. Fort Worth Indep Sch Dist
as 23-11136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candace Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Fort Worth Independent School District
SEARCY v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
HENRY SEARCY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and JUSTIN MAXSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivera Diaz et al v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reedy, Sylvester Thomas, Antonio Brooks and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, Cpt William Dokert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Mr. Macintire et al
as 4:2023cv03731
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Mr. Macintire and Mr. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Danyell Searcy
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Searcy v. Brossard et al
as 4:2023cv03441
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Brandon Brossard and Robert Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Castillo et al
as 4:2023cv03647
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcey and Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Officer Castillo and Officer Chany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Fowler v. Clinton Perry, Jr., et al
as 23-12872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON PERRY, JR., DEXTER SPIKES, MICHAEL THOMAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
