Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Mayfield v. Neville et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Gary C Mayfield
Defendant:
Dr Neville, Nurse Fulton, Warden Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore et al v. Darts et al
as 1:2013cv07373
Plaintiff:
Cortez Lornell Moore
Defendant:
Tom Darts, Gary Hickerson, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Sgt. Jenkins and Officer Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner et al (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hayes
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Cummings and Sgt. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Husz et al
as 2:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dante Nichols
Defendant:
John Husz, Charles Quarles, Sgt Brick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins, Christopher Jenkins, Othelle Rhue and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint, James Slaigh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00683
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Nurse Jones, Nurse Well, Doctor Cobbler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAHR, SR. v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
RANDALL I. LAHR, SR.
Defendant:
THOMAS HANLON, DAVID SGT. JENKINS, MICHEAL LAFABIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Office of the Lake County Sheriff et al
as 1:2007cv01329
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Williams
Defendant:
Office of the Lake County Sheriff, Mark C. Curran, Jr., Officer Knaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
