Cases 11 - 20 of 41
WILLIAMS et al v. SHANTHONY et al
as 2:2018cv14767
Plaintiff:
JAHVAYZIA GADSON and SHERRI WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRASPORT, INC. and MOSS E SHANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Sherry Williams Brown
Defendant:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marilyn Hamilton v. Adam Buck, et al
as 17-3505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARILYN L. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM BUCK, CI/CT, JENNA MONLEY, SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAM R. HITE and others
Williams v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00579
Plaintiff:
Sherry Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
HAMILTON v. PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
MARILYN L. HAMILTON
Defendant:
ADAM BUCK, JENNA MONLEY, SHERRY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodjinski et al v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Woodjinski , Cynthia Hicks , Lynn McKenzie and others
Defendant:
Stellar Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILLIAMS v. OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 9:2015cv81402
Plaintiff:
SHERRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 9:2015cv81401
Plaintiff:
SHERRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walker v. Escandon et al
as 1:2015cv03235
Plaintiff:
Brian Tirell Walker
Defendant:
J. C. Escandon, E. S. Osterberg, R. D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29615
Plaintiff:
Sherry Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
