Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vereen et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02369
Plaintiff:
Michael Vereen , Eugene C Sutley , Jason Seymour and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Randal Williams v. Carmen Sutley
as 5:2012cv00302
Defendant:
Carmen Sutley
Plaintiff:
Randall Williams
Clarence Davis v. Carman Sutley
as 09-55545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMAN SUTLEY, Dentist
Jorge Tovar v. Dr. Marquez et al
as 5:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jorge Tovar
Defendant:
Marquez, Garsh, Sutley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Riches et al v. Russo et al
as 1:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Kelly Abercrombie, Richard M. Langway and others
Defendant:
Steve Eugene Russo and Lawrence Peter Sutley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Davis v. Carman Sutley
as 5:2007cv01415
Plaintiff:
Clarence Davis
Defendant:
Carman Sutley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTLEY v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
RICK SUTLEY
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
