Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
BARRETT et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2017cv00468
Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: DETTA BARRETT and THOMAS BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2415
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gardner v. Barrett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00925
Plaintiff: Dennis Gardner
Defendant: Thomas Barrett, Tim P. Kam, Steven Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder v. Barrett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00381
Plaintiff: Marva Crowder
Defendant: Thomas Barrett, Thomas Giudice, D Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. Andrews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff: Marlon Currie
Defendant: Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Barrett v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07627
Plaintiff: Thomas Barrett
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett v. USA
as 4:2016cv00104
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Frankie Jae Thomas Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06245
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner: RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrett et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00690
Plaintiff: Thomas Barrett and Kathy Barrett
Defendant: AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?