Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Qualls et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv06049
Plaintiff:
Leonard Qualls , Connie M Qualls , Teresa D. Davis and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation , Johnson & Johnson , Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Van Trump et al
as 5:2015cv06104
Plaintiff:
Neil W. Davis and Teresa T. Davis
Defendant:
Ray J. Van Trump and Atlas Roofing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Davis v. Social Security
as 2:2015cv12644
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis et al v. Ameridose LLC et al
as 1:2014cv14033
Plaintiff:
Teresa A. Davis and Garrett C. Davis
Defendant:
Ameridose LLC , Box Hill Surgery Center, LLC, Ritu T. Bhambhani, MD, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solis v. Livingston et al
as 7:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Arturo Solis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oliver J Bell, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al. v. Ameridose, LLC
as MD/1:14-cv-00749
Plaintiff:
Teresa A. Davis and Garrett C Davis
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11685
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07273
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13986
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13986
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
