Cases 11 - 20 of 35
United States v. Randy Garriss
as 21-1715
Defendant:
Steven A. Nelson and Theodore John Nelson, Jr.
Interested Party:
Randy L. Garriss
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jermaine Tart v. Sergeant Eaton
as 21-6128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ANTWAN TART
Defendant:
OFFICER HICKMAN, MATTHEW THEODORE JOHNS, NURSE SWALLIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT EATON
Anderson v. US
as 21-1277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HASLAM, FREDERIC CLOS, ROBERT SWIECH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Convergen Energy LLC et al v. Brooks et al
as 1:2020cv03746
Plaintiff:
L'Anse Warden Electric Company, LLC, Libra Capital US, Inc., EuroEnergy Biogas Latvia Limited and others
Defendant:
Steven J Brooks, Urincha SL, Riverview Energy Corporation and others
Jermaine Tart v. Matthew Johns
as 20-6327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ANTWAN TART
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. PENDOLINO, NURSE SWALLIS, OFFICER HICKMAN and others
COLLINS v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Commissoner of Social Security and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
Theodore John Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
TART v. JOHNS et al
as 1:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTWAN TART
Defendant:
MATTHEW THEODORE JOHNS, VARIOUS JOHN DOES, OFFICER HICKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. O'Malley
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Defendant:
Theodore John O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Tart v. Johns et al
as 5:2017ct03251
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Antwan Tart
Defendant:
Matthew Theodore Johns and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPPER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
THEODORE JOHN COPPER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
