Cases 11 - 20 of 151,054
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hultman v. Mattson et al
as 3:2024cv03381
Plaintiff:
Charlene Hultman
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Mattson, KS Mattson Partners, LP, LeFever Mattson, Inc. and others
Thomas v. Trout Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Thomas
Defendant:
Trout Transportation, LLC and Paul W. Victor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cotton v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Cotton
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmody v. New York University
as 24-1516
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN A. CARMODY, M.D., M.H.P.E
Defendant:
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS and others
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Stochevski v. Weingarten et al
as 4:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Walter Stochevski
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Lynn A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BURKE v. DUGAN et al
as 3:2024cv06672
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BURKE
Defendant:
STEPHANIE L. DUGAN, DETECTIVE SERGEANT KEITH FINKELSTEIN, P.O. W. SABIN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
