Cases 11 - 20 of 21
POOL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02369
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W POOL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BEY v. SULLIVAN et al
as 5:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
TALIB WASI BEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN V SULLIVAN, NATHAN DEAL, ROBYN A CRITTENDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poole, Sr. v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Actavis, Inc. and Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Clarke et al
as 2:2014cv00662
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Poole
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Thomas Redman, Major Wilmouth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 3:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sherry W. Poole
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Sheahan
as 1:2013cv00095
Petitioner:
C. W. Poole
Respondent:
M. Sheahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manriquez v. Tilton, et al
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canning v. Poole et al
as 5:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Canning
Defendant:
Barbara W. Poole, Barbara W. Poole, DVM, Inc., William T. Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manriquez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv02427
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
POOLE v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv64949
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. POOLE, JAMES W. POOLE and JAMES W. POOLE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
