Cases 11 - 20 of 30
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GAUL
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. GAUL, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Good v. Gray
as 1:2021cv11812
Petitioner:
John J Good, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rathmann v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00033
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Commissioner Pelicia E. Hall, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Kent W. Rathmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamey v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00738
Defendant:
Commissioner Palicia Hall, Officer Taetska Marshall, Leiutenant Tiaja Wesley and others
Plaintiff:
Alina Lamey
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Borders
as 4:2019cv04212
Respondent:
Warden Dean Borders
Petitioner:
Frank Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smalls v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv03330
Defendant:
Warden Cothran, Officer Timmons, Warden Leamon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald C. Smalls and Gerald Smalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chris A. Tingirides v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv02098
Defendant:
Dr. Han Duong, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Warden Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Tingirides
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Ivan McNeal v. Dean Borders
as 5:2018cv01695
Respondent:
Warden Dean Borders and Dean Borders
Petitioner:
Peter Ivan McNeal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Legette v. McBee et al
as 4:2017cv02896
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leo Legette
Defendant:
Cpl. McBee, Lt. Larry and Warden Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
