Cases 211 - 220 of 567
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brunner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02907
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Brunner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Barnes v. Brunner et al
as 2:2018cv02449
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
R. Lopez, J. Brunner, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison v. Warden, Dauphin County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv01712
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allison
Defendant:
Warden, Dauphin County Jail, Gregory Brunner, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Board Of Probation And Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. O'Connor
as 1:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro Camacho v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv01571
Defendant:
Sharon Brunner, James S Terrell, The County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunner v. 19 Parker Brothers Shotguns
as 1:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Brunner
Defendant:
19 Parker Brothers Shotguns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Daniel Tonnemacher v. Daniel Brunner
as 18-60037
Debtor:
In re: KATHLEEN TONNEMACHER
Appellant:
DANIEL TONNEMACHER
Appellee:
DANIEL H. BRUNNER, Chapter 13 Trustee
Brunner v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
William M Brunner
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brunner v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv01735
Plaintiff:
Gideon Paul Brunner
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
