Cases 21 - 30 of 1,607
Petitte v. Loloft, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05085
Plaintiff:
Craig Petitte
Defendant:
Loloft, Inc., Paola Ibarra, Brendan Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BUNE et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
SARAH BUNE, IAN D'SOUZA, MARK EDELSTEIN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Camacho III v. Ma.Elvia Alvarez Ibarra et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
OSCAR A. CAMACHO III
Defendant:
MA ELVIRA ALVAREZ IBARRA D/B/A TRANSPORTES PAMAR and MARIO PEREZ-MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ibarra v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jesus Antonio Rodela Ibarra
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Advocate Capital, Inc. v Law Offices of Steven Ibarra, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Advocate Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Steven Ibarra, Inc. and Steven Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mission City Community Network, Inc. v. California Department of Health Care Services et al
as 2:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Mission City Community Network, Inc.
Defendant:
California Department of Health Care Services, Bruce Lim, Deborah Manduca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
