Cases 21 - 30 of 2,827
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Poon-Atkins et al v. Poon et al
as 4:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Christy Poon-Atkins, Rhonda Barnette, Kesha Poon and others
Defendant:
John Poon and David Poon
Atkin v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Shannan Atkin
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Atkins v. Jordan et al
as 1:2024cv02970
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Atkins
Defendant:
Carol Ann Jordan, Commissioner Molly Wasow, New York State Division of Child Support and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake T16 Sorelle Owner, LLC v. Diamon Atkins
as 5:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Drake T16 Sorelle Owner, LLC
Defendant:
Diamon Atkins
ATKINS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
ANDREA ATKINS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
