Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nicodemo DiPietro v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-1365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
DIPIETRO v. ELK TWP. POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
PETER DAMIEN DIPIETRO
Defendant:
ELK TWP. POLICE DEPARTMENT, ELK TWP ZONING BOARD and TNT TOWING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Copeland et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ralph Brown
Defendant:
Judge Melissa K. Copeland, Amanda Horn, Yolanda A. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 23-1183
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE EDWARD MCBRIDE and PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY
DiPietro v. Town of Bolton
as 4:2023cv40004
Plaintiff:
Alan DiPietro
Defendant:
Town of Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIPIETRO v. BLACK et al
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIPIETRO
Defendant:
Warden REGAN BLACK, DR RICHARD ROBINSON, HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicodemo DiPietroIn re: Nicodemo DiPietro
as 22-3308
Petitioner:
In re: NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Lake Garrison Inc v. Peter DiPietro
as 22-3017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAKE GARRISON INC
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER DIPIETRO
First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Miami Township et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
First Mercury Syndicate, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Miami Township, Tim Wilson, Michelle Angel and others
Counter Claimant:
Matthew Scott Moore, Marvin Scothorn and John Dipietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
