Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADESA, INC. et al v. LASER APPRAISER, LLC
as 1:2020cv02433
Defendant:
LASER APPRAISER, LLC
Plaintiff:
AUTONIQ, LLC and ADESA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Johnson v. Adesa
as 20-2730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ADESA
ADESA, Inc. v. Lewis et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Abingdon Auto Auction, Inc. and Greg Lewis
Plaintiff:
ADESA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Automotive Finance Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00356
Defendant:
Automotive Finance Corporation d/b/a AFC, Southern Auto Sales, Inc., ADESA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CT102 LLC d/b/a Metro Motors and H. Jeffrey Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
STEELERS KEYS, LLC et al v. HIGH TECH NATIONAL, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv22857
Defendant:
KAR Auction Services Inc., ADESA Inc., CarJoe, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Fieler, Juan Moore, David Slinger and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Automotive Key Controls, LLC and High Tech National LLC doing business as High Tech Locksmiths
Consolidated Defendant:
Jay Wiener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. New York State Department of T
as 20-537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Department of Transportation, NYSDOT, Adesa Corporation, LLC and New York State
Davila v. Adesa Utah
as 2:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Adesa Utah
Plaintiff:
Alex Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
