Cases 21 - 30 of 54,018
Brik v. Brodie
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BRIK
Defendant:
MARGO K. BRODIE, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity and ANN M. DONNELLY, DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Hall v. Gordo, et al.
as 24-3193
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Mayor VICTOR M. GORDO, MAYNOR VARELA and ANNE LANSING
Duneske v. Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11318
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Roseville Police Department, Mitch Berlin, Robert Gudenau and others
Jesse McComb v. Robert Wineman, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JESSE MCCOMB
Defendant:
ROBERT WINEMAN, MARY MOORE, SHERYL PIERRE and others
Kight v. Burkette
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Kight
Defendant:
Duwayne Burkette
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim
Lehey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Lehey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete
Defendant:
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc., RB Global Inc., Ritchie Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddley v. Coopersurgical, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Riddley
Defendant:
Coopersurgical, Inc., Femcare, LTD.- UK Subsidiary of Utah Medical Products, Inc. and Utah Medical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
