Cases 21 - 30 of 151
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13182
Plaintiff:
ROY ANTHONY THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acevedo et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
as 4:2019cv04051
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony, H.C., a minor, Mandy Mace and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thompson v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02078
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. Officer Roser
as 3:2022cv50049
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department and Officer Roser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Mark Thompson
as 22-1224
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Anthony Thompson, also known as Spitty
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ragland
Defendant:
City of Jackson, James Davis, Anthony Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez-Velasque v. Robeson County, et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Celsa Hernandez-Velasque
Defendant:
Johnson Britt, Ken Sealey, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thompson v. People of the State of California
as 5:2021cv08227
Petitioner:
Damarcus Anthony Thompson
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
