Cases 21 - 30 of 910
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN and JAMES T CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD, ARTHUR J CREQUE, CLERK TERESA HATHAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Comcast et al
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Comcast, Jesse Heurta, jennifer_khoury@comcast.com and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Ashford Glass & Mirror, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Depositors Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ashford Glass & Mirror, Inc., Steve Wier d/b/a Wier Enterprises, Sonic Automotive, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford, Jr. v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Corey Dickerson, Deputy Warden Ray and Deputy Warden Levalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford, Jr. v. Ray et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray, Warden Briggs, Deputy Warden Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wulfekuhle v. Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wulfekuhle
Defendant:
Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
