Cases 21 - 30 of 397
Powell v. AutoZone Inc
as 2:2024cv02016
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Jason Powell
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Alvarado v. AutoZone Inc
as 4:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Cristina Alvarado
Defendant:
Autozone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Alvarado v. AutoZone Inc
as 3:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
Cristina Alvarado
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts Inc and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Webster v. Autozone Development, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13033
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Webster
Defendant:
Autozone Development, LLC, Autzone Stores, LLC, AutoZone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Walles et al v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12889
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walles and Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rochelle v. Autozoners, LLC
as 23-7847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROCHELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
AUTOZONERS, LLC, DBA Autozone, ALLDATA LLC, DBA Alldata Automotive Intelligence, AUTOZONE, INC. and others
Defendant:
GEORGE VERKAMP and SATWINDER MANGAT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
