Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,994
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff: AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant: Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant: AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant: PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff: Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company
Interested Party: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NYBECK v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04428
Defendant: SUN COMPANY, INC., FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, DANA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD NYBECK and BARBARA MANN
Cross Defendant: QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS
3Rd Party Defendant: MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Harrell v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02622
Plaintiff: Blanche S Harrell
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Speck v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant: VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff: John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanner v. Crosby Valve, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv02683
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Winston Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Leslie Jack, et al v. DCo, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35563
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Borg-Warner Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID JACK, individually and LESLIE JACK, individually and as Personal Representative of Patrick Jack
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, DCO. LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC and DCO, LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff: Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant: Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?