Cases 21 - 30 of 5,997
Yameen v. CPD et al
as 1:2024cv04487
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Yameen
Defendant:
CPD, JJ Watkins, R. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad Bey v. Clarence Ayers, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD BEY
Defendant:
CLARENCE D. AYERS, KIMBERLY ABOGUNRIN, GERALD E. SMITH and others
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Kenny et al.
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson Bey
Defendant:
Michael Kenny, Marisha Cornisha, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAMES-BEY v. PARSONS
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant:
CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff:
MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
BEY v. SOSAVICKA et al
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAHBEY, ZAMA ELOAH BEY and Candace Rae Winstead
Defendant:
DAVID SOSAVICKA, CHESWICK MAGISTERIAL, CANDACE WINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
