Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 23,683
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff: James Bradley Haag
Defendant: Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant: CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv04875
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff: Mason R Hazen
Defendant: Trey D Lear, Blake Gruny, Bradley M Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff: Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant: Ms. Brown, Sherisse Birch and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Bradley Goddard
as 24-1991
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRADLEY S. GODDARD
Bradley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff: Ogretta Bradley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant: J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
Danitz v. Notbohm
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Bradley John Danitz
Defendant: Rodell Notbohm
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
ASAK Solutions, LLC v. Magic Fumigation, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02695
Plaintiff: ASAK Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Magic Fumigation, LLC, Darin Byer, Luis Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?