Cases 21 - 30 of 33
MCDONALD v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00868
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. MCDONALD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
US v. Charles McDonald
as 14-4697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES STEVEN MCDONALD
Waddlington v. The City of New York
as 13-2071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jullian Waddlington
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Police Officer Charles S. McDonald, (Shield #10025), Police Officers John Doe 1-15 and others
McDonald v. Cherokee County
as 6:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Charles Keith McDonald
Defendant:
Texas Cherokee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene v. McKeller et al
as 1:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene
Defendant:
Charles W. McKeller, Peter Knight, Jeffrey Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Charles McDonald v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-18039
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
MCDERMOTT v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84590
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. MCDONALD
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Waddlington v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05010
Shield #10025:
Police Officer Charles s. McDonald
Defendant:
Police Officers John Doe 1-15 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jullian Waddlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANR Pipeline Company et al v. Louisiana Tax Commission et al
as 2:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company , Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and Southern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Louisiana Tax Commission, Pete Peters, Belinda B. Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
