Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Sanders et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Besson, Dustin Ledoux, Christopher Prosperie and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Morgan v. McCharty
as 1:2018cv05801
Respondent:
T. McCharty
Petitioner:
Christopher Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morgan Scott
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MORGAN et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 2:2017cv05250
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MORGAN and PEGGY L. MORGAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP and LIBERTY MUTUAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Morgan v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morgan
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Sam Hall , Christopher Morgan , Dustin Stevenson and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Union Tank Car Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sevag Demirjian v. Norman Direct LLC et al
as 5:2014cv01917
Defendant:
Christopher Morgan LLC, Does, Norman Direct LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sevag Demirjian
Neal, et al v. California City, et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
James William Neal, III and Cordelia Neal
Defendant:
California City , California City Police Department , Christopher Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. KEAN UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
MICHELE SHARP
Defendant:
KEAN UNIVERSITY, DAWOOD FARAHI, GLENN HEDDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
