Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hover v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv01582
Plaintiff:
David J. Hover
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper, Roger Werholz, C.C.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin v. Haley et al
as 3:2013cv00247
Defendant:
Canteen Services, Sheriff Michael Haley and PCS Communications
Plaintiff:
Stanley Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dayson #213123 v. Cass County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners, Joseph Underwood and Canteen Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cannon v. Canteen Services of Northern MI, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Diane Cannon
Defendant:
Canteen Services of Northern MI, Inc., Lake, County of and Lake County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PATEL v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., GEORGE KILLINGER, MICHAEL ZENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al Do not docket. Case has been electronically transferred out.
as 2:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.