Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Johnson v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04138
Defendant: Ashley Johnson
Plaintiff: Charles Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wysts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04100
Plaintiff: Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant: Officer Damien Wysts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Brookings Police Dept We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04098
Plaintiff: Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant: Brookings Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff: Rafel Antion Jackson
Defendant: Charles Ray Johnson, Dorthy Lee, Chris Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: Johnson Jr.
as 2:2016mc00168
Respondent: Charles Ray Johnson Jr.
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
v. Johnson Jr.
as 2:2016mc00167
Respondent: Charles Ray Johnson Jr.
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Almore et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff: James Allen Almore , Solomon Sylvester Barger , Douglas E. Beasley, Sr. and others
Defendant: John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Johnson v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-20133
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES RAY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18908
Plaintiff: Phyllis Ann Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2014cv01055
Petitioner: Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent: Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?