Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Thomas v. Colvin
as 7:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ann Thomas
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Franks et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as MA/1:15-cv-10954
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Franks and Cheryl Hinds-Thomas
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MANAGEMENT SE., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Franks et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10954
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Franks and Cheryl Hinds-Thomas
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2014cv02396
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Jenett Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00447
Petitioner:
Cheryl Jean Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01625
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv12397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rod J Tawasha et al v. Centex Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00793
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company LLC, Centex Corporation, Centex Homes and others
Plaintiff:
Camille Ricupito, Jeffrey Ricupito, Maysam F Tawasha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00294
Plaintiff:
Cheryl M. Thomas and Cheryl M. Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
