Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Darrell Hunt v. USA
as 19-1942
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL CHRISTOPHER HUNT
Hart et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12353
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Eslyn Jeffrey, Frederick Jimenez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Hunt v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01174
Petitioner:
Darrell Christopher Hunt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pearson v. Dunlap et al
as 0:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
Fredrick M. Pearson
Defendant:
David Dunlap, Associate Warden Stonebreaker, BenJerman Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. USA
as 1:2017cv00104
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDiffett (ID 51141) v. Nance et al
as 5:2017cv03037
Plaintiff:
Shawn W. McDiffett
Defendant:
Charles H. Nance, Kent Saffo, Jennifer Kieltyka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Aristolis Bennett, Aristacia Bennett and Alfricka Bennett
Defendant:
City Of Fayetteville , Christopher Hunt , Michael D. Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Darrell Hunt
as 16-2329
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRELL CHRISTOPHER HUNT
Kenney v. SSA ODAR Hearing, et al
as 15-6229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY C. KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SSA ODAR HEARING, CHRISTOPHER HUNT, Judge, APPEAL COUNCIL OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
