Cases 21 - 30 of 1,181
Clayborne v. Basaldua et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bianca Clayborne
Defendant:
Ruben Basaldua, Donnie Clark, Douglas Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gholston v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gholston
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Posey
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Sgt. Anderson and Michael W. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Gaspard v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Travell Gaspard
Defendant:
Warden C Crabtree, Warden Streeter and Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabtree v. Hatch Stamping Company LLC
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney Crabtree
Defendant:
Hatch Stamping Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Turner v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jerome Turner
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and Byran McPhail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Markel Jason McDaniel
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
