Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Bowman et al v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
as 2:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Chris Crisler, Steve Daniel and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patterson, et al v. GE Capital Financial, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv00700
Defendant:
GE Capital Financial, Inc. and Doe Corporations I-X
Plaintiff:
American Eagle Beverage Enterprises, LLC, American Eagle Beverage Enterprises, LLC, Donald Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RAMIREZ et al v. ROTH PARK GROVE COTTAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01303
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL RAMIREZ and CLAUDIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ROTH PARK GROVE COTTAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., KENT ACHORS, VICTOR MARTINO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Burt
as 5:2007cv14211
Petitioner:
Donald Patterson
Respondent:
Sherry Burt
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
PATTERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2007cv00203
Plaintiff:
DONALD PATTERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
