Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Patterson v. Rogers et al
as 4:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Nicole Rogers, Dalton and Lenard Hogg
Plaintiff:
David Patterson and David Patterson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Karlsson et al
as 2:2020cv01782
Plaintiff:
Kevin David Patterson and Haedyn-Kris Beaumann
Defendant:
Bayless, Karlsson, Ocampo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Bacon et al
as 2:2020cv01655
Plaintiff:
Haedyn-Khris R Beaumann, Kevin D Patterson, Kevin David Patterson and others
Defendant:
Hansen, Bacon, Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv01227
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79071
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79052
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Ray Howard v. Dr. F. Liverso et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant:
Dr. F. Liverso, Dr. David Patterson and Casa Colina Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. State Farm LLoyds
as 3:2020cv00004
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds
Plaintiff:
David Patterson and Margaret Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv04957
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
David Patterson, Barbara Patterson and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv04964
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
David Patterson, Barbara Patterson and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
