Cases 21 - 30 of 1,218
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Duff et al
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Debra Mays Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Duff, Steven Cunningham, Bruce Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
David F. Welch
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31530
Plaintiff:
DAVID DYE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 7:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09164
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KIMBERLY DYE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dye #785330 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
David Lyle Dye #785330
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Catherine Bauman, P. Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
