Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Harrison v. Griffin
as 1:2014cv04452
Respondent:
Thomas Griffin
Petitioner:
Edward Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Griffin
as 14-2679
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edward Harrison
Respondent - Appellee:
T. Griffin
Uaron Mason v. James Gondles, Jr., et al
as 13-3242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Uaron Mason
Defendant - Appellee:
James Gondles, Jr., Executive Director, American Correctional Association, Edward Harrison, Director, National Commission on Correctional Health Care, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Harrison v. Griffin
as 1:2013cv04641
Respondent:
T. Griffin
Petitioner:
Edward Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Harrison et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Uaron Mason
Defendant:
Edward Harrison, Ray Hobbs and Clinton Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Gondles et al
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Uaron Mason
Defendant:
James Gondles , Jr, Edward Harrison, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05148
Plaintiff:
Edward Harrison, II and Patricia Harrison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harrison et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08362
Plaintiff:
Edward Harrison, II and Patricia Harrison
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Midgett v. Head Chaplain et al
as 5:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Edward Harrison Midgett
Defendant:
Head Chaplain and Tyree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
