Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Lewis et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2014cv60230
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dan Lewis , Joan E. Underwood , Murphy E. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
USA v. Smith
as 4:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Floyd Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Smith v. Sticca
as 2:2013cv00829
Defendant:
John Sticca
Plaintiff:
Zeke Floyd Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Francetic
as 2:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Zeke Floyd Smith
Defendant:
Geoffrey Francetic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chappell et al
as 3:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Floyd Smith
Defendant:
K. Chappell, T. Moore, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v Thaler
as 3:2010cv00249
Petitioner:
Glenn Floyd Smith
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73275
Plaintiff:
OLEN LAVOYN JORDAN, CLARENCE JACKSON ALLDREDGE, EUNICE HYDE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LANDY DELMAR ALDRIDGE and ROOSEVELT ALTOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Floyd Smith v. J. Woodford, et al
as 09-15958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD SMITH, AKA Raylon Macon
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD, T. P. GOUGHNOUR, D. DACANAY and others
Richard Simpson v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 09-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J. SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, FLOYD SMITH, Storekeeper Supervisor and JIM BOS, Chairperson of the Muskegon Correctional Store Committee
Simpson #184722 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard James Simpson #184722
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Floyd Smith and Jim Bos
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
