Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Wee Hum et al v. Robert
as 4:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Yean Wee Hum and Siew Pan Teo
Defendant:
Foo Tiang Meng Dirk Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WHITFIELD v. ALLEGHANY CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ALLEGHANY CORP., JEFFERSON W KIRBY, JOSEPH P BRANDON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Justice v. Alleghany Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
Alleghany Corp., Jefferson W. Kirby, Joseph P. Brandon and others
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Lafunxinn, baby921shop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
O'Dell v. Alleghany Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Alleghany Corporation, Jefferson W. Kirby, Joseph P. Brandon and others
Stein v. Alleghany Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03057
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Alleghany Corporation, Jefferson W. Kirby, Joseph P. Brandon and others
Foos v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv00398
Petitioner:
Michael Justin Foos
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
bedford et al v. Robert
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Yuk Fun Joanne bedford, David Richard Mark Alridge and James Konrad Derek Down
Defendant:
Foo Tiang Meng Dirk Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. FOO et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DAVIS
Defendant:
FOO, KNIGHT and JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
