Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Wynter v. Rock et al
as 9:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Wynter
Defendant:
David Rock, Brian Fischer, P. Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1554
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramey et al v. RE/MAX Kansas City et al
as 4:2010cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mallori G Ramey and Christopher B Ramey
Defendant:
RE/MAX Kansas City, Premier Brokerage LLC , David Costello and others
Counter_claimant:
Premier Brokerage LLC , Chris Delong and David Costello
Counter_defendant:
Premier Brokerage LLC , Chris Delong and David Costello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Twitty v. SCDC Classification Representative's Headquarters Dept et al
as 0:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Irving E Twitty
Defendant:
SCDC Classification Representative's Headquarters Dept, James E Brennan, Linda B Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ramey et al v. RE/MAX Kansas City et al
as 4:2009cv03954
Plaintiff:
Mallori G Ramey and Christopher B Ramey
Defendant:
RE/MAX Kansas City, Premier Brokerage LLC, David Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas G. Ramey v. Mississippi Rubber & Specialty, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77389
Defendant:
Mississippi Rubber & Specialty
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Ramey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00933
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMEY v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77389
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. RAMEY
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Ramey et al
as 9:2007cv00874
Plaintiff:
Daryl Jackson
Defendant:
G. Ramey, Gary Greene, Donald Selsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
