Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Savage v. Wiley et al
as 1:2009cv01167
Plaintiff:
Kaboni W. Savage
Defendant:
Ronald Wiley, Harry Lappin and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009ct03096
Plaintiff:
Eddie Joe Walker
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, Newton E. Kendig, Yvonne Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aniton v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv01305
Plaintiff:
Michael Aniton
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harry Lappin and Grayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Grayer et al
as 1:2009cv01103
Petitioner:
Jack Allen Nash
Respondent:
Loren Grayer and Harry Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kirk v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kirk
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, D. B. Drew and Henry Sadoski
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Randall v. Pettiford et al
as 0:2008cv03594
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jay Randall
Defendant:
Michael Pettiford, J Comstock, Darlene Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. Lappin et al
as 2:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Martinez, Jr
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, T C Outlaw, Barron and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 08-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LAPPIN, Director BOP, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director BOP and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
MORALES v. BREW et al
as 1:2008cv00691
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO MORALES
Respondent:
D. B. BREW and HARRY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, T C Outlaw, Unknown Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
