Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Osborne v. Brady
as 3:2015cv05020
Plaintiff:
Michael James Osborne
Defendant:
Housten Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Larry James Osborn
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Whitaker Coal Corp v. James Osborne
as 12-3872
Petitioner:
WHITAKER COAL CORPORATION, self-insured through Sun Coal Corporation
Respondent:
JAMES OSBORNE and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Shell et al
as 2:2011cv03409
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Mike Shell, Teresa Shell, Belinda Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Curtis v. Paulding County, Georgia et al
as 4:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Curtis
Defendant:
Paulding County, Georgia, James Osborne, Gary Guledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSBORNE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86510
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSBORNE
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Flanery v. Lynhart et al
as 0:2008cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Flanery
Defendant:
Mel Lynhart, Clifford Duvall, Maridelle S. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OSBORN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv81285
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSBORN
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, GRAVES-ABER INSULATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
